Sharpen your editing with these press releases

June 11, 2021


By Jim Pumarlo


The hyper partisanship in today’s political landscape was on full display with passage of the American Rescue Plan. It passed on a straight party-line vote.


A Minnesota congressman joined in the chorus of his fellow Republicans characterizing the bill as bloated and wasteful.


Weeks later, he issued a new round of statements. This time, he took credit for the millions of dollars allocated for local projects courtesy of the $1.9 trillion economic relief package.

Double-speak? The lawmaker staunchly defended both his vote and taking credit for the local funding. He was a longstanding advocate for the projects, but opposed the federal plan as full of spending unrelated to COVID-19.


Such exchanges are commonplace at all levels of government as omnibus bills are cobbled together to include anything and everything. It makes great campaign fodder for incumbents and challengers alike in the next election cycle. It’s unfortunate, as well, that most incumbents can get by with having it both ways without constituents playing close attention.


But such proclamations by politicians are an excellent reminder for editors and reporters to be the eyes and ears for their readers and to pay close attention to the PR machines.


Don’t misinterpret. Politicians campaign on the ability to deliver critical votes – for policies and dollars – that benefit local interests. When they do so, they deserve to take credit. At the same time, the partisan debate over the federal relief package should raise the red flag for editors when lawmakers – especially those staunchly opposed to the measure – suddenly “announce” money for local projects.


Incumbents always have taken advantage of the campaign season to step up their public relations efforts. Staffs are adept at seeking and seizing every opportunity.


A lawmaker shows up at a county board meeting to support federal funding for a highway project or a veterans home. An incumbent facing a stiff election challenge coincidentally asks for time on a city council agenda to brief local officials on federal or state legislative issues. A legislative candidate – again, during the heat of a campaign – shows up at a school board meeting to voice support for a building referendum or for more state dollars for education in the interest of closing the academic achievement gap.


Election cycles unfortunately have become year-round affairs, especially the higher you climb the political ladder. Lawmakers routinely seize all chances to get their names in newspapers.


That’s understandable, but it’s no excuse for newsrooms to ignore the obvious ploys for publicity. A lawmaker announces the rules for a state quilting contest. Another reports that shipping season has closed on the local waterway. Others remind property owners when taxes are due.


These items may well be legitimate news, and kudos to the staffs for creativity. But should a lawmaker be given credit – even be mentioned – in the story? Absolutely not. There is no connection whatsoever between the news and the politician.


Funding for local projects delivered by the federal relief bill is news. The reports may well warrant mention of a local member of Congress, but it’s highly questionable whether that is the story lead. A quote is likely sufficient coverage unless there are extenuating circumstances.


The flurry of press releases announcing details of the federal relief package draws attention to the broader issue of when to acknowledge a connection between the “whom” and “what” in everyday reporting. There is no universal right or wrong, but decisions demand consistency. Newsrooms should develop general guidelines, keeping in mind that all circumstances must be reviewed on their individual merits.


Newspapers typically confront these decisions in connection with “bad” or “uncomfortable” news. Take, for example, a business owner who asks that am embarrassing DWI ticket not be reported on the premise that the company is one of the newspaper’s largest advertisers.


Editors should be especially wary when prominent residents – politicians included – expect favorable treatment. These individuals expect that certain items will be published – and, at minimum, that they will be connected to this good news – items that would not ordinarily be reported.


Newspapers should take pause and evaluate. Bending the rules for “good” news can produce just as many headaches for editors as being asked to look the other way when “bad” news occurs.


Jim Pumarlo is former editor of the Red Wing (Minn.) Republican Eagle. He writes, speaks and provides training on community newsroom success strategies. He is author of “Journalism Primer: A Guide to Community News Coverage,” “Votes and Quotes: A Guide to Outstanding Election Coverage” and “Bad News and Good Judgment: A Guide to Reporting on Sensitive Issues in Small-Town Newspapers.” He can be reached at www.pumarlo.com and welcomes comments and questions at jim@pumarlo.com.

Recent Posts

September 10, 2026
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 9, 2026 WYPR Announces The Engagement, a New Weekday Program Hosted by D. Watkins A new WYPR program will bring news, conversation and community together beginning this October BALTIMORE — Baltimore Public Media, home of WYPR and WTMD, today announced The Engagement, a new locally produced, news-driven public affairs program hosted by New York Times bestselling author and award-winning journalist D. Watkins. The program premieres Monday, October 19, and will air Monday through Thursday at 11 a.m. on WYPR 88.1 FM. From the news of the day to politics, community, arts and culture, The Engagement will explore the stories and conversations shaping Baltimore, Maryland and the broader region. Built around the idea that engagement means listening as much as talking, the program will bring different voices and perspectives into the conversation, ask tough questions and challenge assumptions, with an eye toward what comes next. Conversations will extend beyond the broadcast, creating opportunities for ongoing engagement with the people and communities WYPR serves.
September 4, 2026
This summer, six journalism students have been working in newsrooms across Maryland and Delaware. The Reese Cleghorn Internship program hires outstanding student journalists to intern in MDDC member newsrooms each summer. Again this year, MDDC is administering Delaware Community Foundation’s Internship program. Summer internships were made possible through funding from the Delaplaine Foundation, the Goldseker Foundation and The Nutting Family Foundation, Baltimore Fishbowl, Baltimore Brew, and many individual donors to MDDC. These interns were selected from a pool of highly qualified applicants. The intern selection committee, comprised of Andrea McDaniels of The Baltimore Banner, Ann LoLordo, Diana Sugg freelance journalist, Molly Fellin Spence of The Baltimore Sun, Kamau High,, Sam Davis of the Baltimore Sun and Tom Ferraro reviewed more than thirty initial applications, which included a personal essay, published clips and educational and professional references. The committee narrowed the field and conducted a panel interview with each candidate. Each intern was immersed in their host newsroom and treated as a professional working journalist. Students in the program are expected to generate 35-40 published clips and real-world experience during their 8-week paid internship. As part of the program, interns participate in a one-day briefing on how to get the most out of the internship. The interns are (in alphabetical order): Marijke Friedman , University of Maryland (funded by Nutting Family Foundation); Andrew Hall , Morgan State University (funded by the Goldseker); Evelyn Lucado , Washington College (funded by Suzy Dunn); Oliver Mack , University of Maryland, College Park (funded by Delaplaine); Nicole Pilsbury , University of Pittsburgh (funded by MDDC Press Foundation); Theodore Rose , University of Maryland, College Park (funded by MDDC’s fiscal sponsorship of the Baltimore Brew).
By Kristin Wagonblott • July 3, 2026
7/3/26 Group Editor – Jewish Media Division Mid-Atlantic Media Mid-Atlantic Media (MAM), a growing publisher of community and niche media brands, is seeking an experienced Group Editor to lead its portfolio of award-winning Jewish publications.  This leadership role is ideal for an accomplished editor who thrives in a fast-paced newsroom, can manage multiple projects simultaneously, and enjoys mentoring emerging journalists. The successful candidate will serve as both an editorial leader and a public ambassador for our publications, building relationships with Jewish communal leaders and readers throughout the region. This is a high-energy position where a digital-first daily content strategy is combined with the demands of producing high-quality weekly magazines. The candidate will be able to commute to a Columbia, Maryland office. Qualifications Minimum of five years of experience in Jewish community journalism Strong editing skills with the ability to work quickly and accurately in a deadline-driven environment Proven leadership experience managing and motivating editorial teams Familiarity with WordPress, social media platforms, digital photography, and video Ability to balance high-level editorial planning with hands-on reporting, editing, and community engagement Deep knowledge of and connections within the Jewish community required Responsibilities Editor Guide reporters in developing enterprise stories, breaking news coverage, and local exclusives Plan editorial coverage and manage story assignments Monitor community developments, social media, email, and other sources for story ideas and emerging trends Communicate regularly with sources, community leaders, readers, and public officials Oversight of editing and factchecking to ensure adherence to AP Style and company editorial standards Maintain the highest standards of journalistic integrity and quality Team Leader Lead, mentor, and develop a team of reporters and editors Set clear editorial expectations and foster a culture of accountability and excellence Assist with reporting and breaking news coverage when needed Drive strong digital engagement and audience growth across websites, newsletters, and social media platforms Editorial Strategist Represent the publications throughout the communities Help expand audience reach and strengthen brand visibility Collaborate with company leadership on long-term editorial initiatives and growth strategies Work closely with the publisher to identify opportunities for innovation and expansion Compensation Competitive salary and benefits package. To Apply Please submit a cover letter, resume, and relevant work samples to cburke@midatlanticmedia.com . No phone calls, please.
By Kristin Wagonblott • July 3, 2026
Chesapeake Bay Journal Job Announcement Position: Environmental reporter Open date: July 1, 2026 Review start date: July 13, 2026. Open until filled. Description: This is a full-time position with the Chesapeake Bay Journal focused on environmental reporting in the Chesapeake Bay region, mostly in Maryland. The ideal candidate will have 5 to 7 years of journalism experience, including coverage of environmental issues. The successful candidate should demonstrate the ability to grasp complex issues, understand nuances and represent all sides of issues. If selected, you will be part of a small, highly collaborative team that delves into the challenges of providing clean water, clean air and healthy outdoor spaces for humans and wildlife alike. Get ready for deep dives and a variety of field experiences. You might find yourself in the city, on a boat, on a farm, on trails, in laboratories or in suburban neighborhoods. You will interact with a wide range of people, from environmental advocates, businesses and farmers to community members, scientists and government officials. The topics we tackle include but are not limited to water pollution, climate change, environmental justice, the restoration of the Chesapeake Bay and its rivers, land use, sustainable agriculture, air pollution, forest health, plant life, wildlife and fisheries. This position will involve written journalism, as well as video and audio packages to engage our growing audience. Location: All Bay Journal staff members work remotely in priority areas of Maryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia. This position will be in the Baltimore/Annapolis/Frederick area of Maryland. About the Chesapeake Bay Journal: The Bay Journal is a long-standing and well-respected newsroom, now in its 36th year. It is the only media outlet dedicated to environmental issues in the Chesapeake watershed and is one of the oldest nonprofit news organizations in the nation. As well as publishing to our website, we produce a printed, 36-page monthly newspaper and a weekly email newsletter, along with photography, films, videos and podcasts. We reach an average of approximately 200,000 people each month. The Bay Journal has received many awards from regional press associations and is a member of the Institute for Nonprofit News. Minimum Qualifications: Experience in journalism resulting in published work Experience writing about environmental issues Excellent skills in writing, reporting and research, with attention to detail, accuracy and context Commitment to reporting conscientiously on complicated topics Respect for a diversity of sources, thorough fact checking and careful wording Communication and organizational skills that support productivity in an independent work environment Ability to collaborate and meet deadlines Willingness to travel as needed for reporting assignments and staff meetings Willingness to report stories in varied settings, such as towns and cities, farms, forests, industrial sites, schools, research labs, and on boats Other Desired Qualifications: Five to seven years of experience as a journalist, preferably with environmental topics Knowledge of environmental issues in the Chesapeake Bay region Skills in producing video, audio packages, podcasts, photos or social media for a newsroom Salary & Benefits: This is a full-time, salaried position. The salary is commensurate with experience and negotiable based on the total compensation package. Standard benefits include employer-subsidized health insurance and retirement savings plans. The position has four weeks of paid annual leave in addition to federal holidays. How to Apply:  Send a cover letter, your resume, three writing samples (as attachments or via links), up to three multimedia links if applicable, and two references to admin@bayjournal.com . Please use the word “Application” in the subject line. Review of applications begins July 13. Open until filled.
May 27, 2026
By Rebecca Snyder Executive Director, MDDC Press Association  Governor Wes Moore’s veto of SB 459 is a disappointing and misguided decision that overlooks both the capabilities of Maryland’s local news organizations and the urgent need to strengthen the state’s local information infrastructure. The legislation was straightforward and practical: require Maryland state agencies to prioritize local news organizations (print, digital, radio and broadcast) for a portion of their advertising spending. It was revenue-neutral. It did not create a new tax, a new program, or a new bureaucracy. It simply ensured that more Maryland advertising dollars stayed in Maryland communities. Lawmakers across the political spectrum understood that value. SB 459 passed unanimously in the Senate and with overwhelming bipartisan support in the House. Legislators from both parties recognized a simple truth: local news matters. In vetoing the bill, Governor Moore expressed concerns about costs and suggested that Maryland’s local news organizations could not effectively deliver advertising to the audiences state agencies need to reach. That rationale fundamentally misunderstands today’s local media landscape. Maryland’s local news organizations include digital-first outlets, public media organizations, commercial broadcasters, radio stations, community publications, and multimedia news platforms serving audiences across every region of the state. Many operate full service advertising agencies that can place any type of advertising needed, including national platforms. 0020Collectively, they provide sophisticated advertising and communications services that rival — and often outperform — national platforms when it comes to reaching Maryland audiences. Our members regularly execute highly targeted advertising campaigns using digital audience segmentation, programmatic advertising, email marketing, video, social amplification, sponsorships, direct mail, broadcast, radio, and event-based outreach. They work with businesses, nonprofits, healthcare organizations, universities, tourism agencies, and government entities every day to connect messages with precisely the audiences they intend to reach. In fact, local media outlets often have a far deeper understanding of Maryland communities than national advertising platforms ever could. That matters because this debate is about more than advertising dollars. It is about whether Maryland will invest in the civic infrastructure that keeps communities informed and connected. Local journalism remains one of the few institutions dedicated to covering school boards, county governments, public safety, elections, housing, economic development, and the daily issues that shape residents’ lives. When local news organizations disappear, communities lose accountability, civic participation declines, and misinformation fills the vacuum. SB 459 recognized that state government advertising can serve two purposes at once: effectively communicate with Maryland residents and strengthen the trusted local institutions that help those residents stay informed. The bill also acknowledged another important reality: local media outlets are often best positioned to reach underserved communities. Community publications, local radio stations, ethnic media outlets, and regional digital publishers have built trust with audiences that are frequently overlooked by large national advertising buys. Supporting local media is not only smart economic policy; it is smart communications policy. And economically, the argument is equally compelling. Every year, Maryland spends taxpayer dollars on advertising campaigns intended to reach Maryland residents. SB 459 simply sought to ensure that more of those dollars circulate through Maryland businesses, support Maryland jobs, and strengthen Maryland-based organizations rather than flowing almost entirely to out-of-state tech platforms and national advertising networks. That is not protectionism. It is common sense. Other jurisdictions across the country have already adopted similar approaches because they recognize that government advertising dollars can help sustain local media ecosystems without expanding government spending. Maryland had the opportunity to join them with a balanced, bipartisan solution. Instead, the Governor chose to veto it. We respect Governor Moore’s commitment to innovation and economic growth. But on this issue, the administration appears to have underestimated both the sophistication and the reach of Maryland’s local media organizations. This conversation should not end with a veto. Marylanders benefit when they have access to strong local journalism. Communities benefit when trusted local outlets remain financially sustainable. And taxpayers benefit when state communications are delivered through organizations that understand Maryland audiences and communities. Support for local news should not be partisan. The General Assembly understood that. Maryland residents understand that. We hope the administration will reconsider its view of what local media can accomplish and recognize that investing in Maryland journalism is also an investment in Maryland communities.
Show More