Congratulations to our 2025 Editorial and Advertising contest winners!

Six journalism students have been selected as newsroom interns for the summer of 2026 through MDDC’s Reese Cleghorn Internship program. Funding for these internships was made possible the Delaplaine Foundation, the Goldseker Foundation and The Nutting Family Foundation, Baltimore Fishbowl, Baltimore Brew, and many individual donors to MDDC  The interns were selected from a pool of highly qualified applicants. The intern selection committee, comprised of Andrea McDaniels of The Baltimore Banner, Ann LoLordo, Diana Sugg freelance journalist, Molly Fellin Spence of The Baltimore Sun, Kamau High of The Capital Gazette, Sam Davis of the Baltimore Sun and Tom Ferraro reviewed more than thirty initial applications, which included a personal essay, published clips and educational and professional references. The committee narrowed the field and conducted a panel interview with each candidate. Each intern will be treated as a professional working journalist at his or her host newsroom, with the expectation of generating 35-40 published clips and real-world experience during their 8-week paid internship. As part of the program, interns participate in a one-day briefing on how to get the most out of the internship. MDDC will also hold its popular “Into the Newsroom” series, which brings together reporters, freelancers and interns from MDDC member organizations for skill building training sessions. Interns will also be partnered with mentors, who will offer guidance outside the newsroom and coaches who will focus on writing skills. The interns are (in alphabetical order): Marijke Friedman University of Maryland; Andrew Hall , Morgan State University; Evelyn Lucado , Washington College; Oliver Mack , University of Maryland; Nicole Pilsbury, University of Maryland; Theodore Rose , University of Maryland.

We are featuring amazing examples of investigative journalism by our news media members that demonstrate the ideals of Sunshine Week in action! Sunshine Week is a nonpartisan collaboration among groups in the journalism, civic, education, government and private sectors that shines a light on the importance of public records and open government. This year’s efforts are coordinated by Joseph L. Brechner Freedom of Information Project at the University of Florida’s College of Journalism and Communications. And supported by John S. and James L. Knight Foundation and thrive with a growing list of partners. Sunshine Week is about the public’s right to know what its government is doing, and why. Recent investigative and transparency reporting from MDDC members During Sunshine Week, MDDC will feature important investigative pieces that show the power of local reporting and transparency in our communities. Please tag your own work with #SunshineWeek2026 to be part of the conversation. Josh Investigates – Josh Shannon – Newark Post (The) Inmates share medical records to prove alleged BCDC H.pylori outbreak – Alexis Taylor- Afro American (The) The housing hustle igniting a foreclosure crisis in Baltimore – Hallie Mikker, Giacomo Bologna, Shahanna Jayaraman – Baltimore Banner (The) Thousands say they were sexually abused in Maryland juvenile detention centers. – Madeleine O’Neill – Baltimore Beat Maryland’s public employee union quietly loses $1 million in “phishing scam” – Mark Reutter – Baltimore Brew Health care’s heavyweight showdown – Matt Hooke, Craig M. Douglas – Baltimore Business Journal Rehoboth using AI to track license plates, Rehoboth issues AI camera report, etc. – Chris Flood – Cape Gazette Off the Rails – The Howard Center for Investigative Journalism – Capital News Service ‘Ticking time bombs’ – Coal ash pits pepper the Bay watershed – Timothy B. Wheeler, Whitney Pipkin – Bay Journal He admitted ‘filthy’ chats with a teen. Cumberland made him police chief . – Madeleine O’Neill Federal filing by ‘shadowy’ group trolling Moore leaves questions unanswered – Bryan P. Sears – Maryland Matters Toddler tram death linked to equipment problems, probe finds – Bethany Hooper – OC Today-Dispatch https://spotlightdelaware.org/2025/06/12/wilmington-lobbied-biden-camp-to-bring-presidential-library-to-the-city/ – Brianna Hill, Karl Barker – Spotlight Delaware Visit Harford nonprofit reportedly spent thousands on parties, gifts, alcohol – Matt Hubbard – Aegis Intentional hole cut in Fort Detrick lab suit – Ceoli Jacoby, Marwa Baraka – Frederick News-Post (The) Hundreds of Delaware teachers found working on expired licenses – Kelly Powers, Esteban Parra – News Journal (The)

This Thursday is the ninth annual Student Press Freedom Day , a national moment to amplify student journalists in your community and to stand up for their free press rights.  Amid escalating censorship, intimidation and legal threats, student journalists are rising to the occasion. Across the country, they’ll be educating their peers about press freedom through op-eds, on-campus events and more. Here are some ways you can stand with them: 1) Share on social media: Tell your followers why student journalism is so important to democracy. And if you were a student journalist, share what it meant to you! Be sure to use #StudentPressFreedom, and you’re welcome to tag the Student Press Law Center. 2) Report on local student journalists: Whether it’s a news story about what they’re doing for Student Press Freedom Day or a feature story on their challenges and successes, this is an opportunity to spotlight the essential work they’re doing at high schools and/or colleges near you. Here are seven things to know to aid your reporting. 3) Write an editorial or column: Explain to your audience why it is important to protect and support student voices through journalism, and to train the next generation of truth tellers. This toolkit has some ideas to help. 4) Republish this free-to-use story: The Student Press Law Center and other organizations have partnered to launch the Student Press Report, an editorially independent news desk to cover college journalism. Out this week, the first story is an in-depth look at the state of college journalism . You are welcome to republish this story and photos with credit ( details here ). Of course, you can take these steps to amplify student journalism any time of the year! The Student Press Law Center , which organizes the Day each year, is the nation’s only legal organization devoted to defending and advancing the free press rights of student journalists. If SPLC can be helpful this week or any time, please don’t hesitate to reach out to Josh Moore at jmoore@splc.org .

The Maryland–Delaware–District of Columbia Press Association (MDDC) represents local news organizations serving communities across our region. Our members rely on clear and consistent access to public information to inform residents about how government operates and how public resources are used. We are concerned by recent actions affecting the ability of local Inspectors General to obtain unredacted government records necessary to perform their duties. While this issue has emerged in Baltimore City and Montgomery County, the implications extend beyond any one jurisdiction.  Inspectors General are established by local law to identify fraud, waste, abuse, and misconduct in government operations. Access to financial records, personnel records, and other internal documentation is central to that responsibility. When access is restricted or delayed, the oversight process itself is weakened. This is not simply an internal dispute between agencies and oversight offices. It directly affects the public’s ability to understand how government functions and how taxpayer dollars are spent. Inspector General investigations frequently surface information that would not otherwise come to light. Their reports provide residents, elected officials, and the news media with independent insight into government operations. It is important to recognize that Inspectors General operate within clear confidentiality boundaries. They are legally obligated to protect sensitive information and do not publicly disclose personnel files, medical information, or confidential financial data. Public reports describe findings and systemic issues without naming individuals, vendors, or contractors under scrutiny. The process is designed to balance oversight with discretion. If Inspectors General are denied access to the records necessary to determine whether there is cause to investigate a complaint, that balance is disrupted. Oversight cannot function effectively without access, and transparency is diminished as a result. Maryland’s Public Information Act was enacted to promote transparency and accountability. Clarifying the law to ensure that Inspectors General retain appropriate access to government records—while maintaining existing confidentiality protections—would reinforce that purpose. We urge the General Assembly to address this issue promptly and ensure that local Inspectors General can carry out their legally mandated responsibilities. Strong oversight supports effective governance, strengthens public confidence, and upholds the public’s right to know. We believe a strong news media is central to a strong and open society.

The relationship between public relations and local news has always required care, trust, and clarity. In 2026, that relationship matters more than ever. Local newsrooms are operating with fewer resources, tighter timelines, and growing responsibility to the communities they serve. At the same time, PR professionals are navigating a crowded information environment where visibility is harder to earn and credibility is easier to lose. Episode 153 of Five Dubs , the MDDC Press Association podcast, brought those realities into focus. In a wide-ranging conversation with editors from Baltimore Fishbowl , The Daily Record , and The Afro , one message came through clearly: strong PR–media relationships are built on understanding how local news actually works today—not how we wish it worked. Here’s what PR professionals should know heading into 2026. Local News Has Less Time — Not Lower Standards Shrinking newsrooms are not a new story. But the implications are often misunderstood. Editors and reporters are covering more beats with fewer people. That means there is less time for follow-ups, rewrites, and clarification. What it does not mean is that standards have changed. Verification still matters. Relevance still matters. Accuracy still matters. For PR professionals, this means: Lead with the most important facts, clearly and early Explain why the information matters to a specific audience Make sourcing transparent and easy to verify A clear, well-focused pitch respects a newsroom’s time and increases the chance that a story will be considered on its merits. One Media Landscape, Many Missions One of the strongest takeaways from Episode 153 is that “local media” is not a single thing. Each outlet represented serves a distinct audience: Baltimore Fishbowl balances lifestyle and hard news for a growing regional readership The Daily Record focuses on business, legal, and government coverage statewide The Afro centers Black communities, with deep reporting on culture, policy, faith, and local impact The same announcement may be relevant to all three—but not for the same reason. Effective PR in 2026 means shaping pitches to fit the outlet’s mission, audience, and coverage priorities. Generic outreach is easy to spot and easy to dismiss. Thoughtful framing signals respect and preparation. Relationships Matter More Than Distribution Mass distribution tools are everywhere. Trusted relationships are not. Editors emphasized that familiarity and reliability make a difference. Knowing what an outlet covers, understanding who handles which beats, and offering useful information—before you need coverage—builds credibility over time. PR professionals who act as informed colleagues rather than transactional messengers are more likely to be remembered when a relevant story breaks. This is not about exclusivity. It’s about consistency, accuracy, and mutual respect. AI Is in the Workflow — Judgment Is Not Artificial intelligence is already part of newsroom operations, supporting tasks like transcription, research, and workflow efficiency. But editorial judgment remains human. Editors are still responsible for deciding: Which stories serve their communities Which sources are credible How information is framed and contextualized AI-generated pitches that sound polished but lack substance are easy to spot. What stands out instead is real expertise, local knowledge, and accountability. In 2026, trust is still built person to person—even when tools are involved. Embargoes and Timing Matter One practical point that resonated across the panel: timing can make or break a story . Embargoed information, when used appropriately, helps small newsrooms plan coverage and prepare thoughtful reporting. Last-minute requests—especially for non-breaking stories—are harder to accommodate. On the flip side, reporters often operate on tight deadlines when news is breaking. Understanding that pressure works both ways strengthens collaboration. Good PR anticipates newsroom realities rather than reacting to them. Not Every Story Is Daily News — And That’s Okay A recurring theme was the importance of matching stories to the right format. Not every announcement is suited for daily editorial coverage. That doesn’t mean it lacks value. Editors discussed multiple paths for visibility: Feature stories tied to broader trends Special sections and editorial calendars Honorifics and recognition programs Sponsored content when appropriate Understanding these options—and being open to them—helps organizations reach audiences without forcing a story into the wrong frame. Community Voices Are Still Underrepresented Across outlets, editors agreed: the most underreported voices are often the people most affected by policies and programs. Announcements about funding, initiatives, or leadership changes are stronger when paired with: Voices from the community People doing the day-to-day work Individuals directly impacted PR professionals can play a critical role by helping newsrooms connect with those voices—not just institutional spokespeople. This approach doesn’t dilute a message. It strengthens it. Underreported Stories Still Need Help Surfacing Editors also pointed to gaps in coverage that PR can help address: Local economic development beyond major institutions Emerging industries and small business ecosystems Regional stories outside major population centers New and diverse expert voices Surfacing these stories requires context, patience, and an understanding of how they fit into a newsroom’s existing coverage. What This Means for PR in 2026 The future of PR and local news is not adversarial. It is interdependent. Strong earned media outcomes come from: Clear, fact-based communication Respect for editorial independence Alignment with audience needs Long-term relationship building In a fragmented media environment, credibility remains the most valuable currency. Local news organizations are not just content distributors. They are community institutions. PR professionals who understand that—and work within it—will be better positioned to tell meaningful stories in 2026 and beyond.

January 30, 2026 It rarely starts with a headline-grabbing showdown. More often, it looks like small frictions that most people never see: a reporter is suddenly barred from a public building they’ve covered for years. A records request that used to take weeks now takes months. A newsroom has to spend money on legal help instead of reporting. A source hesitates to speak—because they’re not sure what could happen next. Individually, those moments can sound technical. Taken together, they add up to something communities feel: less trustworthy local news and information, less clarity about what government is doing, and fewer answers when it matters most. That was the focus of a recent Five Dubs conversation between MDDC Executive Director Rebecca Snyder and media attorney Max Mishkin (Ballard Spahr), who helps staff MDDC’s pro bono legal hotline. Their discussion was wide-ranging, but the throughline was simple: when it becomes harder to gather and share verified information, the public loses out. (The interview also included Max’s note that his firm represents the Associated Press in related litigation; he spoke in his personal capacity.) A Series of Signals Over the past year, journalists have watched several developments unfold at once. There have been federal searches involving reporters. Press access at the Pentagon and the White House has narrowed. Public media has been defunded at the federal level. Public records systems have slowed or weakened. Government-funded news outlets have faced new pressure over editorial decisions. Any one of these developments might be explained away as temporary or situational. Mishkin cautioned against viewing them in isolation. When access, transparency, and legal protections are all strained at the same time, the impact compounds. For journalists, that means more obstacles to doing routine work. For the public, it means fewer opportunities to understand how decisions are being made and why they matter. This isn’t a “press problem.” It’s an information problem. When people hear about disputes over access at the White House or Pentagon, it can sound like an inside-baseball Washington story. But the effects don’t stay in Washington. Mishkin put it plainly: when you make it harder for reporters to do routine newsgathering, you end up with a less reliably informed public—and that has real consequences for everyday life. That’s because local news and information doesn’t just summarize what happened. It adds what the internet often doesn’t: Context (what this decision means in real life) Verification (what’s true, what’s rumor, what’s missing) Accountability (who decided, who benefits, who’s responsible) Those are the building blocks of trust—and they’re hard to produce when access is reduced, records are delayed, or legal threats escalate. Access isn’t a perk. It’s how accurate reporting happens. Some public institutions allow credentialed reporters to work on-site—not to make them “insiders,” but because proximity enables accuracy. Mishkin discussed how the Pentagon press corps has responsibly reported from inside the building for decades, including in moments of crisis. When access is abruptly narrowed, the practical result is predictable: more reporting based on official statements, fewer opportunities to observe directly, and less ability to ask questions in real time. That matters because the strongest reporting often comes from persistent, on-the-ground coverage—especially when the story is complicated, fast-moving, or high-stakes. When public media is weakened, gaps widen fast. One of the clearest community impacts discussed in the episode: public media. In major metro areas, people can often find multiple sources of local news and information. In many parts of the country, that’s not true. Public radio and public television stations frequently serve as the most consistent source of: emergency alerts school and local government coverage public health updates regional reporting that commercial outlets no longer staff When public media funding is threatened or reduced, it doesn’t just mean “less programming.” In some places, it can mean no reliable local source at all —especially for people who can’t afford multiple subscriptions or who live in communities with limited coverage. Records delayed can mean accountability denied. Public records laws exist so residents can understand what the government is doing. But in practice, most people don’t have the time to chase requests, interpret complex documents, and translate them into usable information. That’s where local newsrooms step in. Mishkin noted that journalists generally don’t have “special rights” under the First Amendment that other members of the public don’t—yet in some records processes (like FOIA), journalists can receive different treatment in specific ways (like fee waivers, expedited processing, and attorney-fee recovery in litigation). Those provisions exist for a reason: getting verified information to the public quickly is a public benefit. When records systems slow down, consolidate, or quietly deprioritize requests, the impact is cumulative: fewer documents obtained fewer investigations completed fewer clear answers for residents And because local newsrooms often work with tight budgets, delays and fees can stop accountability reporting before it starts. Legal pressure changes what gets covered—even when nothing is “censored.” Not all constraints look like a ban. Mishkin explained how subpoenas, searches, and defamation lawsuits shape newsroom decisions behind the scenes. Even when a newsroom ultimately wins a legal fight, the cost is real: money and time spent on legal defense is money and time not spent on reporting. One of the most important points from the conversation: self-censorship is hard to measure . When reporters worry that certain coverage could cost them access, funding, or trigger legal retaliation, stories can get softened—or dropped. The public never sees what didn’t run, so it’s hard to “prove” what was lost. But the community still feels the effect over time: thinner coverage, fewer watchdog stories, and less confidence in what’s true. “Safety” is often used as the justification. Here’s what gets missed. A recurring theme in public debates is that restrictions are about safety or security. Mishkin challenged the idea that responsible reporting is inherently a safety risk. Journalists regularly make judgment calls about what to publish and what to hold, especially around sensitive matters. More importantly, cutting off access can reduce the reporting that helps communities understand waste, failures, or risks inside major institutions—information that can protect both public dollars and public safety. In other words: reducing trustworthy information doesn’t automatically make communities safer. It can do the opposite—by limiting scrutiny and weakening early warning systems. What you can do: small actions that strengthen trustworthy local information This doesn’t require being a media expert. It starts with a simple commitment: choose verified local news and information as part of your routine. Here are practical ways to help keep reliable reporting strong and available when it matters most: Subscribe to at least one local source you trust (even if you also read national outlets). Share reporting that helps neighbors make decisions —especially around schools, safety, local government, and community resources. Support state-level policies that reduce legal “noise” designed to intimidate (for example, strong anti-SLAPP protections and reporter shield laws). If you value public media, say so. In many communities, it’s a core source of trustworthy local information. And if you’re able: consider contributing to efforts that expand access to reporting for everyone, not just those who can pay. When access to information shrinks, the public doesn’t just get fewer headlines. We get fewer verified answers about decisions that shape our schools, our safety, our taxes, and our rights. We get less transparency, less accountability, and more room for rumor to fill the gaps. Local news and information is not about “protecting an industry.” It’s about making sure our communities can see clearly, make informed decisions, and solve problems with shared facts. That’s worth sustaining—quietly, consistently, and together. Listen to the full podcast here . Want to support Five Dubs and local reporting in our region? Subscribe, share an episode with a neighbor, and consider donating to the MDDC Press Foundation (501(c)(3)).

January 13, 2026  The 2026 MDDC Annual Conference returns to Annapolis on May 8, 2026, uniting hundreds of journalists, advertisers, and decision-makers from across the region. Explore sponsorship packages to elevate your brand and champion a strong, independent press.

January 14, 2026 – The MDDC Press Association strongly condemns the FBI’s search of the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson—an extraordinary and deeply troubling action that threatens press freedom and the public’s right to know. Searches of journalists’ homes are exceedingly rare for good reason. While government investigations into unauthorized disclosures are not uncommon, Natanson is neither accused of a crime nor identified as a target of the FBI’s investigation. Federal and state laws, along with long-standing Department of Justice policies, are explicitly designed to protect journalists and their sources from precisely this kind of intrusion. This action represents yet another step in a sustained erosion of press freedoms—one that fosters fear, intimidation, and harassment of journalists whose role is to inform the public and hold power to account. It bears repeating: in the United States, it is not a crime for journalists to obtain or publish classified information. As Bruce D. Brown, president of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, aptly stated, the search of Natanson’s home constitutes “a tremendous escalation in the administration’s intrusions into the independence of the press.” Washington Post Executive Editor Matt Murray rightly characterized the search as an “extraordinary, aggressive action,” reaffirming the institution’s “long history of zealous support for robust press freedoms” and its unwavering commitment to that work. The implications of this raid extend far beyond a single reporter or newsroom. When law enforcement crosses this line, it sends a chilling message to journalists everywhere and undermines the constitutional protections that safeguard a free and independent press. Such actions ultimately harm the public interest by discouraging investigative reporting and weakening transparency in government. The MDDC Press Association calls on federal authorities to respect both the letter and the spirit of press freedom protections and to reaffirm their commitment to the First Amendment. A free press is not an obstacle to democracy—it is essential to its survival. MDDC champions local news media organizations and advocates for press freedom. We stand with journalists and advocate for freedom of the press, ethical standards, and the rights of media professionals to do their work without fear, harassment or violence.

The Center for Integrity in News Reporting is now accepting entries for its annual journalism awards recognizing objective and impartial reporting published in 2025. The program includes six $25,000 cash prizes—now featuring a new Investigative Reporting category—and there are no entry fees. Journalists and editors may submit work directly.